VC Process
The art of saying NO

Liquidation Preferences

Ian Grove-Stephensen of Chalkface Project asked me for my take on liquidation preference.  Well at one level they are not that far removed from some of the preferential share rights that 3i was taking back when I was an Investment Manager there.  We always used CCPPOs - Cumulative Convertable Participating Preferred Ordinary Shares.  Which of course were exactly the same as management Ords - apart from the Cumulation rights, the Conversion rights, the Participating dividend rights, and the prior ranking rights!! The argument being that as minority shareholders we needed some protections.  Of course in some tech fundings the Venture Capital investors will be the controlling shareholders so that doesn't wash. 

In some ways this just comes down to price, if the equity pricing is helped by having them then should the entrepreneur be concerned?  Well consider three scenarios, a stonking success - do we care? No.  A dismal failure - do we care? No.  A business that continues to trade but disappoints against original expectations - do we care?  A little yes but its not our biggest regret.

I guess I can see this from a number of perspectives having been a venture capital investor, but also an adviser, and FD in a VC backed business - of course the detail of the terms matters loads (and there are lots more to worry about) but ultimately the nature of your bedfellows and the price at which you get into bed with them matters loads more. 


The comments to this entry are closed.